I am an m43s shooter, an ex-Lightroom user, and use ACDSee Ultimate exclusively for my raw development. ACDSee flies relatively under the radar so your experience may help others. Please report back when you have more experience of using the combination. I don't think ACDSee can really compete as a raw converter particularly as you use MFT which really benefits from the superior lens corrections and DeepPrime noise reduction. I think ACDSee works rather differently to the normal DAM and doesn't require any import step which should make working with DXO easier? The Ultimate version has quite comprehensive pixel editing features.ĪCDSee started as a DAM and I would expect the combination of DXO-Photolab and ACDSee to be a good match exploiting each programs strengths. It depends which version of ACDSee you are using? Of course I am not arguing about the colors easy to arrange #Bordertool overpower level upgradeSo I seeACDSEEt as an upgrade for FastStone I am currently usingĪnybody has experience to use ACDSEE and DXO PL4 as their main tools ? so what is your workflow ? thanks and eventually use ACDSEE as a DAM, culling tool and perhaps final touch. Here the comparison which show me that I am better to use DXO PL4 to demosaic and denoise. but of course I am more familiar with DXO I spended about 5 mn with ACDSEE and 30s with DXO PL4. So to evaluate briefly it's processing capbility I develop a RAW file with ACDSEE and compare with what I achieve with DXO PL4 I am evaluating ACDSEE ultimate mainly for it's DAM capabilities and the friendly user interface
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |